Online lending start-ups: investors skeptical

Finance


Online lending startups looking to raise money now have to answer one important question that didn’t get asked much in the past: how do avoid the fate of early pioneers like Lending Club or On Deck, which have lost nearly 80 percent of their value since going public in 2014.

At least that’s what Bluevine CEO Eyal Lifshitz has experienced in his meetings with venture capitalists in recent years. Bluevine, an online lender that focuses on small businesses, last did an external round in 2016 and has raised a total of $188 million since its founding in 2013.

“I absolutely needed to have a very compelling story on why we’re not the same as our public market comparables,” Lifshitz said. “That is not something I needed to deal with three years ago.”

Investment in online lending startups exploded on the backs of the success of early pioneers like Lending Club and OnDeck. But Lending Club saw its value sink after failing to meet compliance requirements, which led to the resignation of its star CEO Renaud Laplaunche. OnDeck has been hammered due to concerns around its growth and default rates. Although both companies saw their stock jump on strong earnings this month, they’re still valued at a fraction of what they were at their IPOs in 2014.

Their declines have weighed down online lending startups, pressuring them to show how exactly they’re different from their predecessors.

Meanwhile, investment in the space is slwoing. According to CB Insights, the number of funding rounds in the online lending space is on pace to hit a 5-year low in 2017. The dollar amount is also expected to drop to $2 billion in 2017, less than half of the $4.4 billion the sector saw in 2015.

Lifshitz said investors are questioning the general “viability of the overall lending model,” and it will have a polarizing effect, eventually pushing out the underperforming ones.

For example, Kabbage raised $250 million at a reportedly higher valuation than its last round, while Prosper is reported to be raising at a valuation that’s 70 percent below its previous round. Both companies last raised in 2015.

“There’s going to be some big winners in this space, but some companies are just sub-scale and will eventually die out,” he said.

Lifshitz declined to disclose Bluevine’s revenue or valuation numbers.



Source link

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

Here’s what to evaluate before investing in the SPACs boom
How much Kevin O’Leary makes on Cameo
DraftKings (DKNG): Q4 2020 earnings
Elizabeth Holmes denies destroying evidence in Theranos case
Where can digital nomads work? Croatia, Dubai, Estonia and tropical islands

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *